I see everyone jumping on the bandwagon criticizing Hillary, and rightly so. But they view this as if it was not just a staged event, and the Democrat candidates were actually being candid.

They don't see this as Hillary and the devious Democrats do. This was soft porn for the liberals.

What happened just before all of the fiascos during the Clinton White House years? They put the information out there early, using soft media, so they could address it on their own and not be called on it later, and it would be called "old news" that had been previously and satisfactorily "put to rest". That is the Democrat strategy this time as well.

Hillary (or possibly one of the other contenders)will be challenged by republicans. If the challenges are new, it is news. If those challenges had already been brought up and addressed, albeit in a "friendly" environment, it will be presented as "old news" and not worth following up.

It is my contention that these "attacks" were all staged, and the candidates knew it going in. They were all simply actors. Some, if not most, of the fawning MSM were actually willing participants.

This was more like studio wrestling than actual MMA. The blood was fake. The attacks and indignation were fake. This was strategically done, and accomplished with collusion. It was simply a scam.

They timidly attacked Hillary, preceded by or followed by complaints about the Bush administration. This was quite simply "soft ball".

Republicans challenge Hillary. The MSM, and the liberal plants that whisper in their ears, whine about the Republican "attacks" on Hillary, and it becomes "news", as if it was simply because of their hatred of Mr. Bill. Every challenge is met with skepticism.

But Hillary is running for Democrat nomination for president, and is the present frontrunner.

Republicans don't constantly "attack" Bill Clinton, because he isn't running. although Hillary, as co-president must take responsibility for her actions during that time and their record is fair game. But the MSM tirelessly work to give them cover. Any challenge of Hillary is met with skepticism and contempt.

But when the Democrats attack the Bush administration, all MSM heads nod in agreement, with no skepticism. Yet they see themselves as "unbiased". 

The Hollywood left must be proud. Imitation is the greatest form of flattery. The candidates were all simply actors. There was no substance, and it was all just put on for show. Hollywood presents a lie as the truth. Now the MSM is doing the same for these presidential contender actors, or are they just pretenders?

I say it is time to do a reality check.